How do journalists work? What are they interested in?
What pressures and circumstances influence their work.
Learning the answers to these questions can help us
understand reporters and how to communicate with them effectively.
Contents
It may be hard to believe, having read so many mistaken articles, but
journalists are looking for the truth. However, their ability to
reach the truth is more limited than what we would expect.
This is not a reason for dispair. We simply have to change
our expectations. Take responsibility and give reporters
the information they need.
In search for "the truth" journalists look for
substantiated claims. These
have a greater chance of getting published. Substantiate your claims by
quoting statistics, articles or figures of authority.
Codes of ethics for the media are not usually enforced, since they are not binding. What
happens when a reporter violates the code
depends on the degree of offense, and on how much the reporter is valued
by the employer. However, the codes are useful to cite when
interacting with the media.
Fairness is an example for an ethic code relevant to us.
Journalists have to be fair. Unless appearing in an editorial or
personal column, the report has to be balanced and objective. This
means that they have to get both sides of the story.
Reporters can be biased since some may be too sensitive when
it comes to stories that involve death and human tragedy
(at least for the survivors). This prevents them from being
objective, and covering all sides of the story.
There are several written codes of media ethics on the web:
The ideals are what reporters should aspire to. Circumstances
come in their way.
Reporters have deadlines, so
if you are committed to doing the interview then
do not keep them waiting too long.
Reporters are typically working on several articles
simultaniously. All of these have deadlines. The amount of
depth and research the reporter can perform on all of these
articles is limited. The way the reporter handles this
workload is by performing interviews with people or experts
who are familiar with the topic. Reporters have limited time
to read books, articles or web sites which relate to the article,
even though it would seem that they should. However, the amount
of material available is typically such that the reporter cannot
be expected to read all of it. When you are interviewed, you are
the expert. You can note various references which substantiate
your claims, but do not expect the reporter to read those
references. If you really want the reporter to know what a
reference is saying, summarize it in brief, and tell the
reporter.
Any form of media limits the amount of material which can be presented.
In the press one is limited by space, and on radio/TV the limit is
time.
Frequently, reporters have an idea of how the story will look, and
according to this, they plan the questions they will ask.
If we do nothing but answer the questions then the small space
allocated for our point of view will contain what the reporter
was looking for. In this case, the reporter is in control.
This points out to a different approach to interviews. Instead
of just answering the questions well, we need to take control
of the interview. Similar to the way the reporter has a
preconcieved idea of what he wants to hear from us, we should
have a preconcieved idea of what we want to say to him.
Typically the two do not coincide. Our job is to communicate
our message. We need to take control.
As a compromise between the ideals, circumstances and the
need to make money, the following are news stories which editors
are more likely to be
interested in.
Clash stories involve a catastrophe, crisis,
conflict or crime. For example, an
exceptional personal crisis in the life
of an asher and how it resolved, or conflict between an asher and
the mental health establishment.
Human interest stories would include
sex, money, relations, emotions, celebrities, etc... For example,
a marriage of two ashers, or a celebrity committing suicide.
Finally, stories which describe
Change,
for example, how internet forums have caused changed in the lives
of its participants, or how their underlying culture is evolving.
The structure of mass media organizations is useful
when you want to know who you are taking to and to whom to complain.
The
General Manager hires the
News Director who is responsible
for everything in the news department.
The
Assignment Editor
decides who will cover what. He decides what should be covered, but
doesn't have much to say about the quality of the reports.
The
Producer produces a newscast, i.e. a single show. He decides
which stories will be aired and in what order. Larger stations
may have an
Executive Producer, who supervises other producers.
He might be responsible for accuracy and fairness.
Reporters and photographers get instructions from the producers
and assignment editors, but only the news director can decide
to fire them, or take any other disciplinary action.
The USA networks have additional structure, they have regional
bureaus. A network crew may include the correspondent, a
field producer, photographer, and sound technician. In case
you are interviewed by a network crew, find out from which
bureau the crew is from, and the name of the field producer,
in case you want to complain. The bureau has a chief which
you can contact in case you want to contact the field
producer or correspondent yet they are not available.
The
General Manager or
Publisher are at the top of the hierarchy,
but they are usually in charge of the financial operation of the
newspaper.
The
Managing Editor (or
Executive Editor) is the top editor
in charge of the news.
There may be many other editors, depending on the subjects covered
by the newspaper. The editorial page may have an autonomous
Editorial Page Editor.
A
Features Editor would be in charge of long-term reporting.